A debate I had yesterday with some old friends and some new friends spawns this post.
We were debating the course and verisimilitude of astrology, its ins and outs, and its relevance to today’s modern world. Those who follow my blog know my opinions on astrology, so I won’t rehash them here. However, during our verbal volleys, I detected detest for anything “faith-based” (read: religion), which, though I abstained from using as philisophical fodder, was still pounced upon as a reason for my dismissive attitude towards their beliefs.
Now, the folks I debated aren’t confirmed atheists (not as far as I know anyways), but their argument certainly took an atheistic perspective. To them, my affirmation of God’s existence was license to dismiss my opinion as no more than Christian hardheadedness. To me, the reason for religion is much more than something to believe in. It serves many vital purposes in our society, from regulating the way our laws are shaped to giving those down on their luck the hope of a better tomorrow.
Still, atheists continue to label all religion as brainwashing, with the idea of God being a fairytale, created as an opiate for the masses. Settling this age-old dispute through the traditional views of a faith-based perspective is impossible, so I will, reluctantly, remove the idea of God from the equation, deigning to debate on atheists terms of logic to show them the futility of their ways.
Human beings have a need to believe, extending from the very first moment one is old enough to understand. Whether the need to believe manifests itself through a higher power, patriotism for one’s country, greed (or the belief that money is the most important thing [we can see the detrimental effects of this through the Wall St. protests]), or even more terrible ideas like Neo-Nazism, humans, when left to their own devices, must believe in something other than themselves.
The most basic example of this is seen in our interdependent communities: although it seems insignificant, the idea that everyone is not out to harm you is a kind faith. You have faith that when you go grocery shopping, the attendant won’t try to rip you off for your spare change. You have faith that your friends aren’t secretly plotting to rob you of your golden dubloons or whatever you have of value, and not because it’s a logical conclusion, but for no reason at all. That lack of logical reasoning, that unexplainable quality, that raison-detre is none other than faith.
An imaginary detractor I’ll invent for the purpose of this treatise might say, “Wait! But doesn’t the law prevent people from doing such things? Criminal activities are punished by the law, not kept at bay by beliefs.” He or she would be 100% correct in their analysis too. However, the law is inherently moral, and, at least in the United States, based loosely on religious concepts (“thou shalt not kill,” “thou shalt not steal,” etc., etc.). Even if there were no actual God, could you afford to ignore the value of religion as a moral compass for civilization? Methinks not.
Imagine, if you will, a culture without established rules or laws, besides the one inherent in every human: “survive.” Surviving by any means necessary eliminates almost every institution created by civilized man; education, government, the military, the concept of ownership and even the idea of literacy are not required for one to live. All these were motivated by man’s faith in himself, which produces the idea of cooperation (or faith in others) that we can create a better world.
Atheists, for all their shortcomings, do have a purpose in pointing out the faulty nature of man when it comes to God. Religion can– like every other human organization– become terribly corrupted, hypocritical, encouraging of ignorance while sugarcoating failure. So can welfare. But that doesn’t mean that we should eliminate one’s right to worship their creator or spurn the disenfranchised because some may abuse or rely on those institutions. The atheist’s major shortcoming is his inability to see the endgame. Getting rid of religion means abolishing the moral system on which the modern world is founded. In essence, the atheist, with all his qualms about religion, is bound to a system rested on religious principle– a system in which he actively participates and believes. The futility of the atheist, then, is his disagreement with principles he himself follows.
Now, back to our regularly scheduled programming.












